GOD
ESTABLISHES HIS CHURCH IN THE WORLD
What
Happens When You Hang Around Jesus?
Acts
4:1-14
SCC
Jerry
A Collins
3/9/03
Why do religious leaders want to
persecute Christians?
What does it mean to be filled with the
Holy Spirit?
Why is their salvation in no other name
than Jesus?
It is an important principle
that says we often become like the people we choose to hang around with. That
is why it is so important the kind of friends your children have. One of my brothers who had served some time in prison many years ago,
says that it was the direct result of the friends he chose to have in his life.
Without that he would never have participated in the things that eventually
landed him there. The disciples, now apostles, were also influenced by someone they had chosen to hang around with. We see in this
passage the influence of being around Jesus expressed in their message,
ministry, mandate and manner. Their enemies recognized them as having been
with Jesus vs. 13 and that made all of the difference.
1. THE INFLUENCE OF JESUS’
MESSAGE DEMANDS DECISIONS 1-4 The they in vs. 1 is Peter and John vs. 13. It is
their message they heard from Jesus that demands
decisions. The nature of the message forces a decision to be made. There are
only two decisions that can be made. They are both illustrated here.
(1) The decision to oppose
this message 1-3. The opposition came from the priests, captain of the temple,
Sanhedrin. The Priests were the ordinary priests who conducted sacrifices.
The Captain of the temple guard was the chief of the temple police force. The
Sadducees were wealthy landowners and businessmen who had political aspirations
and opposed the Pharisees not believing in a resurrection, angels or the spirit
world. This entourage were religiously connected as we
shall see with the rulers, elders, scribes and high priest (vs. 5-6). Together
this was formidable opposition. It says they came upon them being greatly
disturbed and has the idea of coming suddenly and what greatly
disturbed them was first, that Peter and John were teaching the
people vs. 2. These men had no credentials, no sanction or reputation as
teachers and yet they were confidently teaching people while they were
uneducated and untrained men vs. 13. This was intolerable. And offensive to them. Second, they taught by
means of Jesus the resurrection of the dead. Christ is proof of the
resurrection 1 Cor 15. The Apostles used Jesus as
proof of resurrection truth and the Sadducees could not tolerate that. The verb
greatly disturbed suggests they are emotionally involved here. So since
they could not disprove the resurrection, and they never tried to in Acts, in
their frustration all they could do was only imprison these witnesses vs. 3.
Since it was nearly evening and Jewish law did not permit trials at night,
though this was ignored in Jesus’ case, they detained them overnight.
(2) The decision to believe
the message 4. Imprisoning the messengers did not nullify the
effect of the message. They could seize them but never imprison the Word of
God. Even as they are arrested multitudes of people believe. 5000 is the cumulative number
of men so far and this is the last mention of a specific number in Acts though
the churches continued growth in cited in (5:14; 6:7; 9:31; 12:24; 16:5; 19:20;
28:31). So, too, we may be removed from the scene (persecution, sickness, death
or travel) yet if we have presented God’s Word and not our own that Word can
continue to work and bear fruit. The influence of Jesus’ message upon these
apostles is being passed onto others. It results in both belief and unbelief.
2. THE INFLUENCE OF THE HS
GIVES US BOLDNESS IN OUR MINISTRY 5-12 The
detailed description of the opposing Sanhedrin in vs. 5-7 underscores the pomp/power
of this assembly. Simple fishermen were in midst of highest leaders in
the land. These rulers were the Jewish supreme court,
the Sanhedrin. Annas was Caiaphas’
father-in-law. Annas was High Priest from A.D. 6-15
and deposed but still a figurehead while Caiaphas was
high priest from A.D. 18-36. This assembly had examined Jesus on trial and now
ironically were facing 2
of Jesus’ prominent &
bold followers. Nothing is known of the others mentioned. Their question in vs.
7 implied they had not been given authority to speak so where had it come from.
Peter’s boldness beginning in vs. 8-12 stands in stark contrast to his previous
denial. Here he could have failed again. The difference was that Peter was filled
with the holy spirit vs. 8. All Xian ministry and
witness depends on fullness of the HS. God’s does the
filling as we yield to it by obedience and faith. We do not manufacture this we
submit to it. The result is boldness not fear, silence or compromise vs. 9-12. First
was a bold accusation, on trial…for a benefit to a sick man vs. 9. Certainly
it could not be wrong to heal a lame man so he can walk again. Second was a
bold explanation, by the name of Jesus Christ…whom God raised vs. 10. This
is the reason the beggar stood before them in good health. Here is the contrast
between what they had done with Jesus and what God had done with him. Third,
was a bold argumentation, aitho they rejected
Jesus, He became the very cornerstone vs. 11. Even tho
Jesus did not fit their concept of Messiah Peter uses Psa
118:22 to support his message fulfilled the OT truth about Jesus. Jesus was the
stone rejected by them and yet God made Him the very cornerstone thru
resurrection. Again Peter places them in opposition to the very work and will
of God they believe they were doing. Fourth, was a bold invitation, there
is salvation in no one else…by which we must be saved vs. 12. Here is an
invitation for them to repent and embrace Jesus Christ as Messiah. Here is the
grace of God, acting toward these directly guilty of death of God’s Son. There
is no evidence that any accepted this offer of salvation made to them. Deliverance only in Jesus. We preach an exclusive Christ in
an inclusive age. Religious people can be the hardest to repent.
3. THE INFLUENCE OF JESUS IN OUR LIVES ASTONISHES
PEOPLE 13-14 While the opposition
was impressed with their confidence and amazed that uneducated and untrained
men (authors of 7 books still in use today) could have such boldness and
arguments, it dawned on them it was because they had been with Jesus, another who
had not possessed credentials. They,
too, had been boldly and fearlessly confronted by him (MT 7:28-29). He, too,
had no formal rabbinic training (Jn 7:15-16). Yet He
had no equal in handling the OT Scriptures (Jn 7:46).
He had also performed miracles and his followers were on trail because of one.
For the moment, this convincing defense was unanswerable 14.
(1) Opposition to God’s truth may also give us a
priceless opportunity to present it.
(2) God is able to take our weak points and transform them into strength
for Him. While Peter here is a new man, in another sense it is the same Peter
we knew before--quick to speak. Once a weakness now a
strength. (3) God calls us to
witness of Him but he has not molded, guided or dealt with any two exactly alike.
Peter & John 30 yrs more.